The America hating Obama has cancelled the manned moon missions. Mr. "I want a jobs bill on my desk now," has just canned thousands of workers in the space industry.
Long hated by short-sighted lefties, the moon missions, and the rest of the space programs, were one of the strongest bones in the body of American international prestige and power. "We could use all that money to provide jobs and feed people," has long been a cry of the rabid left faction. As usual, the short sighted piggies never considered the numerous space related discoveries and tens of thousands of job radiating from that industry. Obama is head down and locked in his effort to make the United States of America as effective on the world stage as his home country, Kenya.
photo from the FoxNews web site
Friday, January 29, 2010
Thursday, January 28, 2010
From the Daily Mail of England
The below article from England's Daily Mail was sent to me by an old friend in Singapore. This sort of ridiculous bureaucratic nonsense is what we have to look forward to with Mr. Obama.
"Send me you tired, your hungry, your stupid."
From the Daily Mail
Employer told not to post advert for 'reliable' workers because it discriminates against 'unreliable' applicants
By Ryan Kisiel and Andrew Levy
Last updated at 11:26 AM on 27th January 2010
When it comes to hiring staff, there are plenty of legal pitfalls employers need to watch out for these days.
So recruitment agency boss Nicole Mamo was especially careful to ensure her advert for hospital workers did not offend on grounds of race, age or sexual orientation.
However, she hadn't reckoned on discriminating against a wholly different section of the community - the completely useless.
When she ran the ad past a job centre, she was told she couldn't ask for 'reliable' and 'hard-working' applicants because it could be offensive to unreliable people.
'In my 15 years in recruitment I haven't heard anything so ridiculous,' Mrs Mamo said yesterday.
'If the matter wasn't so serious I would be laughing out loud.
'Unfortunately it's extremely alarming. I need people who are hardworking and reliable - and I am pleased to discriminate in that way. If they're not then I really can't use them. The reputation of my business is on the line.
'Even the woman at the jobcentre agreed it was ridiculous but explained it was policy because they could get sued for being dicriminatory against unreliable people.
'She told me they'd had lots of problems with people taking them to court for adverts stating something like "would suit school leaver".'
Mrs Mamo, 48, of Borehamwood, Hertfordshire, runs Devonwood Recruitment, which supplies hundreds of cleaners, caterers and porters to hospitals across the country.
She filed the advert for a £5.80-an-hour domestic cleaner at a hospital in Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, through the Jobcentre Plus online service last Thursday.
However, when she rang the nearest branch in Thetford, Norfolk, to make sure details would be available to jobseekers who turned up in person, she was transferred to a woman who said the wording was unacceptable.
Mrs Mamo, a divorced mother of two, added: 'I had to battle to have "must speak English", which they also said was discriminatory.
'In the end, I had to write "must speak English due to health and safety reasons" because they're dealing with hazardous materials.'
The diktat was widely criticised yesterday. A spokesman for the Campaign Against Political Correctness said: 'This is absolutely ridiculous.
'Of course people want reliable workers and employers should be able to ask for them. If they can't advertise for what they want then the system is broken.'
The Equality and Human Rights Commission added: 'This is in no way in breach of any discrimination law.
'Mrs Mamo should consider very unreliable any advice that she may have received implying that this aspect of her advert was discriminatory.'
Yesterday the Department for Work and Pensions said it could not comment on the conversation Mrs Mamo had with the member of staff at Thetford.
However, a spokesman insisted her original advert had run on the Jobcentre Plus website and on computer terminals in branches.
She added: 'Reliability is important to employers and we welcome ads seeking reliable applicants.'
"Send me you tired, your hungry, your stupid."
From the Daily Mail
Employer told not to post advert for 'reliable' workers because it discriminates against 'unreliable' applicants
By Ryan Kisiel and Andrew Levy
Last updated at 11:26 AM on 27th January 2010
When it comes to hiring staff, there are plenty of legal pitfalls employers need to watch out for these days.
So recruitment agency boss Nicole Mamo was especially careful to ensure her advert for hospital workers did not offend on grounds of race, age or sexual orientation.
However, she hadn't reckoned on discriminating against a wholly different section of the community - the completely useless.
When she ran the ad past a job centre, she was told she couldn't ask for 'reliable' and 'hard-working' applicants because it could be offensive to unreliable people.
'In my 15 years in recruitment I haven't heard anything so ridiculous,' Mrs Mamo said yesterday.
'If the matter wasn't so serious I would be laughing out loud.
'Unfortunately it's extremely alarming. I need people who are hardworking and reliable - and I am pleased to discriminate in that way. If they're not then I really can't use them. The reputation of my business is on the line.
'Even the woman at the jobcentre agreed it was ridiculous but explained it was policy because they could get sued for being dicriminatory against unreliable people.
'She told me they'd had lots of problems with people taking them to court for adverts stating something like "would suit school leaver".'
Mrs Mamo, 48, of Borehamwood, Hertfordshire, runs Devonwood Recruitment, which supplies hundreds of cleaners, caterers and porters to hospitals across the country.
She filed the advert for a £5.80-an-hour domestic cleaner at a hospital in Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, through the Jobcentre Plus online service last Thursday.
However, when she rang the nearest branch in Thetford, Norfolk, to make sure details would be available to jobseekers who turned up in person, she was transferred to a woman who said the wording was unacceptable.
Mrs Mamo, a divorced mother of two, added: 'I had to battle to have "must speak English", which they also said was discriminatory.
'In the end, I had to write "must speak English due to health and safety reasons" because they're dealing with hazardous materials.'
The diktat was widely criticised yesterday. A spokesman for the Campaign Against Political Correctness said: 'This is absolutely ridiculous.
'Of course people want reliable workers and employers should be able to ask for them. If they can't advertise for what they want then the system is broken.'
The Equality and Human Rights Commission added: 'This is in no way in breach of any discrimination law.
'Mrs Mamo should consider very unreliable any advice that she may have received implying that this aspect of her advert was discriminatory.'
Yesterday the Department for Work and Pensions said it could not comment on the conversation Mrs Mamo had with the member of staff at Thetford.
However, a spokesman insisted her original advert had run on the Jobcentre Plus website and on computer terminals in branches.
She added: 'Reliability is important to employers and we welcome ads seeking reliable applicants.'
Sunday, January 24, 2010
Whatever it is that Obama is smoking in his peace pipe, he needs to try something else. A health care bill that no one cares about – look at the polls, B.H.O., I thought you guys really paid attention to that stuff. A health care bill that will bankrupt the country? No interest. A bill of two thousand pages, put together in secret? No interest. Take all the money from the rich? Hey ding-ding, who do you think gives everybody else jobs? When the banks fail, so does everything else. Why help them go down?
The president is trying to sell the same old left-wing bullshit that nobody wants, by calling it something else and speaking louder.
The president is trying to sell the same old left-wing bullshit that nobody wants, by calling it something else and speaking louder.
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Social Scrap
It appears that the Health Care Bill - Democratus Stupidicus - may have to be scrapped.
How many millions of dollars have been pissed away, and billions promised, on this anti-American piece of legislation? Beloved by Socialist and Communist alike, tears are flowing tonight in D.C. "But we only wanted to make the world a better place, even out the monetary hills and valleys. We only wanted Universal Love."
For the vastly unhappy, Nancy, et al, I would suggest a single mighty leap from a tall building, for the people.
I don't know what kind of guy Mr. Brown of MASS is, but he's sure started off right.
How many millions of dollars have been pissed away, and billions promised, on this anti-American piece of legislation? Beloved by Socialist and Communist alike, tears are flowing tonight in D.C. "But we only wanted to make the world a better place, even out the monetary hills and valleys. We only wanted Universal Love."
For the vastly unhappy, Nancy, et al, I would suggest a single mighty leap from a tall building, for the people.
I don't know what kind of guy Mr. Brown of MASS is, but he's sure started off right.
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Oh, Dear Me
Mr. Brown has been shoved up the nose of Mr. Obama, et al. What a pity. How could such a thing happen? Let us hope it happens again. Often.
Wonder if Ms Coakley can buy a friend?
Saturday, January 16, 2010
Where are the supplies?
There seems to be great consternation among various groups as to why adequate supplies haven't gotten to Haiti. Am I mistaken, or are these the same leftist swine that screamed and jumped about when President Bush was unable to make rescue supplies appear by magic in New Orleans? I would guess they won't be blaming Obama in the same way they blamed Bush.
Tons of supplies are not easy to move nor are they instantly available, no matter who's the president. The Haitians are about to riot because the US hasn't yet saved them. What a goat rope that place is. We - our country - has always helped whomever they could, but it takes time. Hard to understand when you're starving, but still reality.
I understand Danny Glover blamed the earthquake on global warming. 'Nuff said.
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Short clips of New Orleans
Officer Alfred Celestain was killed in an auto accident, when some mope ran into his police car.
In other fun news, officers engaged in a high-speed chase and shoot-out which ended when the bad guys ran off the roadway and into a canal. They swam free. The police are asking anyone who had their house/car/covered-wagon shot up to contact police headquarters.
I'm SO glad I'm out of that.
Sunday, January 10, 2010
From an article by Drew Zanh in World Net Daily:
Anyone who says that this is the dawn of a new age of conservatism," writes New York Times op-ed columnist Charles M. Blow, "is engaging in wishful thinking on a delusional scale."
So concludes Blow after writing that watching tea partiers push back against establishment Republicans is like watching "some version of 'Hee Haw'" – the former TV variety show that spoofed the hillbilly side of country music – "meets '28 Days Later'" – a horror film where a rampant virus turns infected people into zombie-like, murderous monsters.
Liberals are big on FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Just ask them. Except, of course, when someone disagrees with their stated position. Then the person who has the nerve to disagree is described as an evil zombi, etc. I would say that Mr. Blow is well named.
Wo
Saturday, January 9, 2010
Larry Lambert has a new book
Larry Lambert has a new novel coming out in February. I suggest you rush out and buy it. Rush, rush.
It deals with America's "Secret War"in Laos, in the early '60s.
It deals with America's "Secret War"in Laos, in the early '60s.
Friday, January 8, 2010
We SEE you
"Private Eye, watching YOU, and everything that you do. Private Eyeeeeeeeee . . . . ."
One of these would come in hand at Mardi Gras.
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Say What??!!??
The ACLU has stated that it's not a good idea to stop the repatriation of Yemeni terrorists to Yemen. The ACLU doesn't like it when we hold terrorists instead of turning them loose? To kill again?
I think the goddamn ACLU is violating my rights and those of other Americans who do not wish to have themselves blown up by Arab thugs. What nerve. I guess this is more of YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK. One would suppose that their motto is: Let a million Americans die before you violate the rights of one terrorist.
I think the goddamn ACLU is violating my rights and those of other Americans who do not wish to have themselves blown up by Arab thugs. What nerve. I guess this is more of YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK. One would suppose that their motto is: Let a million Americans die before you violate the rights of one terrorist.
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
Saturday, January 2, 2010
Letter passed on by a friend
The below letter, passed on by an old Army buddy, relates to the Senator from California - Barbara Boxer - and a stupid comment she made to a general who was, very politely, addressing her committee. What a doink that woman is.
The man who wrote the letter us from Alaska. speak right up in the Cold North, don't they?
Wo
Do you remember the scene? The Senate. Barbara Boxer hearing from a Brigadier General? Silly General! He addresses Barbara as "Ma'am", and she CORRECTS him in front of millions of people, telling him she's "worked SO hard to earn the title, "Senator", so please to use that when speaking to her.
Get a load of this letter!
Read the letter sent to Sen. Barbara Boxer from an Alaskan Airlines pilot below.
Many of us witnessed the arrogance of Barbara Boxer on June 18, 2009 as she admonished Brigadier General Michael Walsh because he addressed her as "ma'am" and not "Senator" before a Senate hearing.
This letter is from a National Guard aviator and Captain for Alaska Airlines named Jim Hill. I wonder what he would have said if he were really angry. Long fly Alaska !!!!!
Babs:
You were so right on when you scolded the general on TV for using the term, "ma'am," instead of "Senator". After all, in the military, "ma'am" is a term of respect when addressing a female of superior rank or position. The general was totally wrong. You are not a person of superior rank or position.. You are a member of one of the world's most corrupt organizations, the U.S. Senate, equaled only by the U.S. House of Representatives.
Congress is a cesspool of liars, thieves, inside traders, traitors, drunks (one who killed a staffer, yet is still revered), criminals, and other low level swine who, as individuals (not all, but many), will do anything to enhance their lives, fortunes and power, all at the expense of the People of the United States and its Constitution, in order to be continually re-elected. Many democrats even want American troops killed by releasing photographs. How many of you could honestly say, "We pledge our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor"? None? One? Two?
Your reaction to the general shows several things. First is your abysmal ignorance of all things military. Your treatment of the general shows you to be an elitist of the worst kind.. When the general entered the military (as most of us who served) he wrote the government a blank check, offering his life to protect your derriere, now safely and comfortably ensconced in a 20 thousand dollar leather chair, paid for by the general's taxes. You repaid him for this by humiliating him in front of millions.
Second is your puerile character, lack of sophistication, and arrogance, which borders on the hubristic. This display of brattish behavior shows you to be a virago, termagant, harridan, nag, scold or shrew, unfit for your position, regardless of the support of the unwashed, uneducated masses who have made California into the laughing stock of the nation.
What I am writing, are the same thoughts countless millions of Americans have toward Congress, but who lack the energy, ability or time to convey them. Regardless of their thoughts, most realize that politicians are pretty much the same, and will vote for the one who will bring home the most bacon, even if they do consider how corrupt that person is. Lord Acton (1834 - 1902) so aptly charged, "Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely."
Unbeknownst to you and your colleagues, "Mr. Power" has had his way with all of you, and we are all the worse for it.
Finally Senator, I, too, have a title. It is "Right Wing Extremist Potential Terrorist Threat." It is not of my choosing, but was given to me by your Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano. And you were offended by "ma'am"?
Have a fine day. Cheers!
Jim Hill
16808 - 103rd Avenue Court East
South Hill , WA 98374
The man who wrote the letter us from Alaska. speak right up in the Cold North, don't they?
Wo
Do you remember the scene? The Senate. Barbara Boxer hearing from a Brigadier General? Silly General! He addresses Barbara as "Ma'am", and she CORRECTS him in front of millions of people, telling him she's "worked SO hard to earn the title, "Senator", so please to use that when speaking to her.
Get a load of this letter!
Read the letter sent to Sen. Barbara Boxer from an Alaskan Airlines pilot below.
Many of us witnessed the arrogance of Barbara Boxer on June 18, 2009 as she admonished Brigadier General Michael Walsh because he addressed her as "ma'am" and not "Senator" before a Senate hearing.
This letter is from a National Guard aviator and Captain for Alaska Airlines named Jim Hill. I wonder what he would have said if he were really angry. Long fly Alaska !!!!!
Babs:
You were so right on when you scolded the general on TV for using the term, "ma'am," instead of "Senator". After all, in the military, "ma'am" is a term of respect when addressing a female of superior rank or position. The general was totally wrong. You are not a person of superior rank or position.. You are a member of one of the world's most corrupt organizations, the U.S. Senate, equaled only by the U.S. House of Representatives.
Congress is a cesspool of liars, thieves, inside traders, traitors, drunks (one who killed a staffer, yet is still revered), criminals, and other low level swine who, as individuals (not all, but many), will do anything to enhance their lives, fortunes and power, all at the expense of the People of the United States and its Constitution, in order to be continually re-elected. Many democrats even want American troops killed by releasing photographs. How many of you could honestly say, "We pledge our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor"? None? One? Two?
Your reaction to the general shows several things. First is your abysmal ignorance of all things military. Your treatment of the general shows you to be an elitist of the worst kind.. When the general entered the military (as most of us who served) he wrote the government a blank check, offering his life to protect your derriere, now safely and comfortably ensconced in a 20 thousand dollar leather chair, paid for by the general's taxes. You repaid him for this by humiliating him in front of millions.
Second is your puerile character, lack of sophistication, and arrogance, which borders on the hubristic. This display of brattish behavior shows you to be a virago, termagant, harridan, nag, scold or shrew, unfit for your position, regardless of the support of the unwashed, uneducated masses who have made California into the laughing stock of the nation.
What I am writing, are the same thoughts countless millions of Americans have toward Congress, but who lack the energy, ability or time to convey them. Regardless of their thoughts, most realize that politicians are pretty much the same, and will vote for the one who will bring home the most bacon, even if they do consider how corrupt that person is. Lord Acton (1834 - 1902) so aptly charged, "Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely."
Unbeknownst to you and your colleagues, "Mr. Power" has had his way with all of you, and we are all the worse for it.
Finally Senator, I, too, have a title. It is "Right Wing Extremist Potential Terrorist Threat." It is not of my choosing, but was given to me by your Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano. And you were offended by "ma'am"?
Have a fine day. Cheers!
Jim Hill
16808 - 103rd Avenue Court East
South Hill , WA 98374
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)